A deal between the United States and the Taliban to de-escalate the war in Afghanistan will likely include a communication mechanism to prevent military miscalculations during that time period, a U.S. official tells VOA.The communication mechanism would serve the same purpose as one set up between U.S. and Russian forces in Syria to avoid unsafe military incidents between Washington and its partner forces on one side, and Russian and Syrian government forces on the other.Multiple officials tell VOA the start date for a “reduction in violence” agreement between the U.S. and the Afghan Taliban is planned for Saturday.  A senior U.S. defense official said the U.S. military would maintain its authority for self-defense and would continue U.S. counterterrorism operations and the training and advising of Afghan forces during this agreement period.U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, center, shakes hands with Afghan President Ashraf Ghani, right, as US Secretary of Defense Mark Esper watches during the 56th Munich Security Conference in Munich, Germany, Feb. 14, 2020.If the deal holds, Taliban sources have said a signing ceremony would take place in Doha, Qatar, on Feb. 29. Foreign ministers from all of Afghan’s neighboring countries, Islamic countries, Russia and the European Union would be invited to attend the signing ceremony in Doha, according to Taliban officials.U.S. officials say successful implementation of the temporary reduction in violence agreement would pave the way for a comprehensive peace deal that could end America’s longest war and bring some of the U.S. troops in Afghanistan home. Inter-Afghan dialogue between the Afghan government and the Taliban is expected to follow the reduction in violence agreement.“If we decide to move forward, if all sides hold up — meet their obligations under that reduction in violence — then we’ll start talking about the next part,” U.S. Secretary of Defense Mark Esper told reporters at the Munich Security Conference last week.The war in Afghanistan has claimed the lives of more than 2,400 U.S. service members and has cost Washington nearly $1 trillion.The term “reduction in violence” has created some confusion among Afghan government officials who question why both sides refrain from calling it a ‘cease-fire.’Sediq Sediqqi, spokesperson for the President of Afghanistan gestures as he speaks during a press conference in Kabul on Sept 8, 2019.Sediq Sediqqi, a spokesperson for Afghan President Ashraf Ghani, told reporters in Kabul earlier this month that the Taliban’s commitment to anything short of a full cease-fire would not produce the desired outcome to end the war.“Does it mean that not 10, but five people will lose their lives? Or it means that there won’t be 10 attacks, but five daily?” Sediqqi said.President Ghani, however, on Saturday during the Munich Security Conference voiced cautious optimism about a partial truce agreed between the Taliban and the U.S. He said he was on the same page with Washington.Some former Taliban officials, including former deputy minister of justice during the Taliban regime Jalaluddin Shinwari, said a complete cease-fire could carry the risk of divisions in its ranks and a dispersion of Taliban fighters.The Taliban has so far insisted that it would talk to the Afghan government as one of the groups among other factions in the country not as a government. The Afghan government, however, insists that it would enter the so-called intra-Afghan dialogue with the insurgents as the legitimate government elected by the Afghan people.Afghanistan’s presidential candidate Abdullah Abdullah arrives for a news conference after the preliminary presidential election results in Kabul, Afghanistan, Dec. 22, 2019.The news of a potential deal with the Taliban and subsequent intra-Afghan dialogue comes amid an ongoing political struggle between Ghani and his main rival, Chief Executive Abdullah Abdullah.Afghanistan’s Independent Election Commission (IEC) said Ghani secured 50.64% of the votes and declared him the winner of the country’s fourth presidential election since 2001.Ghani’s main rival, Chief Executive Abdullah, who has shared power with Ghani since the 2014 presidential elections as part of the National Unity Government, rejected Tuesday’s results as “fraudulent” and vowed to announce the forming of his government soon.The Taliban also rejected the presidential election as “fraudulent” and called Ghani’s victory “illegal.”In a statement, the insurgent group said any elections under “foreign occupation” could never help settle the conflict in the country.VOA’s Hasib Danish Alikozai in Washington contributed to this story.
…

A deal between the United States and the Taliban to de-escalate the war in Afghanistan will likely include a communication mechanism to prevent military miscalculations during that time period, a U.S. official tells VOA.The communication mechanism would serve the same purpose as one set up between U.S. and Russian forces in Syria to avoid unsafe military incidents between Washington and its partner forces on one side, and Russian and Syrian government forces on the other.Multiple officials tell VOA the start date for a “reduction in violence” agreement between the U.S. and the Afghan Taliban is planned for Saturday.  A senior U.S. defense official said the U.S. military would maintain its authority for self-defense and would continue U.S. counterterrorism operations and the training and advising of Afghan forces during this agreement period.U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, center, shakes hands with Afghan President Ashraf Ghani, right, as US Secretary of Defense Mark Esper watches during the 56th Munich Security Conference in Munich, Germany, Feb. 14, 2020.If the deal holds, Taliban sources have said a signing ceremony would take place in Doha, Qatar, on Feb. 29. Foreign ministers from all of Afghan’s neighboring countries, Islamic countries, Russia and the European Union would be invited to attend the signing ceremony in Doha, according to Taliban officials.U.S. officials say successful implementation of the temporary reduction in violence agreement would pave the way for a comprehensive peace deal that could end America’s longest war and bring some of the U.S. troops in Afghanistan home. Inter-Afghan dialogue between the Afghan government and the Taliban is expected to follow the reduction in violence agreement.“If we decide to move forward, if all sides hold up — meet their obligations under that reduction in violence — then we’ll start talking about the next part,” U.S. Secretary of Defense Mark Esper told reporters at the Munich Security Conference last week.The war in Afghanistan has claimed the lives of more than 2,400 U.S. service members and has cost Washington nearly $1 trillion.The term “reduction in violence” has created some confusion among Afghan government officials who question why both sides refrain from calling it a ‘cease-fire.’Sediq Sediqqi, spokesperson for the President of Afghanistan gestures as he speaks during a press conference in Kabul on Sept 8, 2019.Sediq Sediqqi, a spokesperson for Afghan President Ashraf Ghani, told reporters in Kabul earlier this month that the Taliban’s commitment to anything short of a full cease-fire would not produce the desired outcome to end the war.“Does it mean that not 10, but five people will lose their lives? Or it means that there won’t be 10 attacks, but five daily?” Sediqqi said.President Ghani, however, on Saturday during the Munich Security Conference voiced cautious optimism about a partial truce agreed between the Taliban and the U.S. He said he was on the same page with Washington.Some former Taliban officials, including former deputy minister of justice during the Taliban regime Jalaluddin Shinwari, said a complete cease-fire could carry the risk of divisions in its ranks and a dispersion of Taliban fighters.The Taliban has so far insisted that it would talk to the Afghan government as one of the groups among other factions in the country not as a government. The Afghan government, however, insists that it would enter the so-called intra-Afghan dialogue with the insurgents as the legitimate government elected by the Afghan people.Afghanistan’s presidential candidate Abdullah Abdullah arrives for a news conference after the preliminary presidential election results in Kabul, Afghanistan, Dec. 22, 2019.The news of a potential deal with the Taliban and subsequent intra-Afghan dialogue comes amid an ongoing political struggle between Ghani and his main rival, Chief Executive Abdullah Abdullah.Afghanistan’s Independent Election Commission (IEC) said Ghani secured 50.64% of the votes and declared him the winner of the country’s fourth presidential election since 2001.Ghani’s main rival, Chief Executive Abdullah, who has shared power with Ghani since the 2014 presidential elections as part of the National Unity Government, rejected Tuesday’s results as “fraudulent” and vowed to announce the forming of his government soon.The Taliban also rejected the presidential election as “fraudulent” and called Ghani’s victory “illegal.”In a statement, the insurgent group said any elections under “foreign occupation” could never help settle the conflict in the country.VOA’s Hasib Danish Alikozai in Washington contributed to this story.
…

The Taliban’s deputy chief, in a rare newspaper opinion piece published Thursday, has said that despite mutual mistrust, the insurgent group is “fully committed” to upholding a peace deal it is about to sign with the United States to end the war in Afghanistan.“The long war has exacted a terrible cost from everyone.… Everyone is tired of war,” Sirajuddin Haqqani, the militant commander who allegedly directs suicide bombings and other insurgent attacks out of neighboring Pakistan, wrote in The New York Times.Haqqani stressed that achieving the potential of the U.S.-Taliban agreement and ensuring its success would depend on “an equally scrupulous observance” by Washington of each of its commitments.“Only then can we have complete trust and lay the foundation for cooperation — or even a partnership — in the future,” said Haqqani, who allegedly maintains close ties with the Pakistani spy agency, the Inter-Services Intelligence. Pakistan denies having any links to Haqqani or his dreaded militant network, known as the Haqqani Network (HN).The newspaper article comes after U.S. and Taliban officials recently agreed to a seven-day period of reduced violence in Afghanistan. If the temporary truce is successful, the two adversaries could sign the long-awaited peace agreement later this month.Speaking on Tuesday, President Donald Trump said that he saw “a chance” of a peace deal with the Taliban, which would lead to the withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan and end America’s longest war.“We are negotiating with the Taliban. We’ve been negotiating with them for a while. We will see what happens. There’s a chance of making a deal. There’s a chance,” Trump told reporters at Joint Base Andrews in Maryland.Both sides have negotiated a draft agreement in contentious 18-month talks.FILE – This Qatar Ministry of Foreign Affairs photo from Feb. 25, 2019, shows U.S. and Taliban representatives meeting in Doha to discuss ways to end the Afghan war.The deal provides a timetable for the withdrawal of American and coalition forces from Afghanistan, insurgent counterterrorism security guarantees, and a process for political reconciliation between Afghan parties to the conflict.“My fellow Afghans will soon celebrate this historic agreement. Once it is entirely fulfilled, Afghans will see the departure of all foreign troops,” Haqqani wrote.Washington has placed a reward of up to $10 million for bringing Haqqani to justice for plotting deadly cross-border attacks against U.S. and coalition forces in Afghanistan.U.S. officials also accused the Haqqani Network of being behind high-profile kidnappings of foreigners, including Americans, in the war-shattered country.Tuesday’s outcome of the controversy-marred Afghan presidential election, announced nearly five months after it was held, has posed a new challenge for the U.S.-led Afghan peace process.The Afghan election commission has declared incumbent Ashraf Ghani the first-round winner. But runner-up Abdullah Abdullah swiftly rejected the result as “illegal,” declaring himself the winner and threatening to form his own government in Kabul.The Taliban, which denounces Ghani as an American puppet and refuses to engage in any intra-Afghan talks under his leadership, also criticized the result. It was an outcome of what the insurgent group called “fake and staged” elections, saying Ghani’s “unlawful” election is also “in conflict with the contents of the ongoing peace process” with America.The emerging political crisis has raised questions and doubts about whether Afghans will be able to form a united team to engage in the much-sought peace negotiations with the Taliban to discuss a permanent nationwide cease-fire and power-sharing in post-war Afghanistan.
 
…